China has no historic rights over South China Sea: Hague Tribunal

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in Hague, the Netherlands has rejected China’s claims to economic rights across large swathes of South China Sea. Ruling in this regard was given by a five-member tribunal appointed by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in Hague in a case brought by the Philippines. The ruling came from an arbitration tribunal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which both China and Philippines have signed. The ruling is binding but the tribunal has no powers for enforcement.
There was no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources within the South China Sea areas falling within the ‘nine-dash line. China has violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights and also caused severe harm to the coral reef environment by building artificial islands in South China Sea. China’s rights are incompatible with the exclusive economic zones (EEZ) provided in the UNCLOS.
About disputes in South China Sea
Disputes in South China Sea are fight mainly between China, Philippines, Vietnam over the territorial sovereignty in South China Sea along with other atolls, reefs and rocky outcrops. China’s claim: It is saying that major portion of these islands belong to them as part of the historical events and area defined by Nine Dash Line.
Under its claim, China already has started and even completed building artificial islands and even strategic runways for mobilising its airforce from these islands. China’s claim overlap the South Chia Sea areas of different claimants countries, that involve Brunei, Vietnam, Philippines, Taiwan and Malaysia. Importance of South China Sea: It is strategically located and major international shipping route as world’s half merchant ships passes through it.
The sea rich in energy (reserves of natural resources around them including petroleum), mineral and fishing resources.
India supports freedom of navigation and flight and unimpeded commerce based on the principals of international law in South China Sea. Believes that states should resolve deputes through peaceful means and exercise self – restraint